PFT Staff is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Topic: Part-time committee meeting
Time: Oct 4, 2019 12:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://cccconfer.zoom.us/j/407277252
Or iPhone one-tap (US Toll): +16699006833,407277252# or +16468769923,407277252#
+1 669 900 6833 (US Toll)
+1 646 876 9923 (US Toll)
Meeting ID: 407 277 252
International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/adFZXL3B9K
Or Skype for Business (Lync):
|WE NEED YOU ON SEPT. 24!|
Join us in demanding a FAIR CONTRACT NOW!
Tuesday, September 24, 7:00 p.m.
District Board Room: 333 E.8th Street, Oakland 94606
Contact: Jennifer Shanoski, firstname.lastname@example.org
Great work PFT Members! We had more than 70 faculty come to the last BoT meeting and that had a positive effect on the board who encouraged us to keep up the pressure. BUT, we need even more people to show this Tuesday to demand: Cost of living increases for 3 years (3.26% this year and state-level colas after)Part-Time Parity Respect for our work!
Copy and paste this letter into the body of your email. Feel free to make it more personal in whatever way you see fit.
EMAIL to: email@example.com
CC: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org And don’t forget to sign your name at the bottom! Dear Chancellor White, I am writing to request that you direct the District negotiating team to settle a new three-year agreement with the Peralta Federation of Teachers.
In 2018-19, Peralta’s full-time faculty salaries are ranked last in the state for those starting their careers and, even at the top of our salary schedules, remain in the lowest third. Meanwhile, part-timers’ wages lag behind full-timers’, with part-time faculty consistently paid less per hour for doing the same work as their full-time colleagues with equivalent levels of experience and education.
And while we all understand that the District is struggling with the effects of mismanagement, we know that funding per FTES within Peralta is in the top third in the state. As you’re aware, the FCMAT report confirmed what PFT has been pointing out for years: cash flow isn’t the problem.
Faculty members like me are the reason that students come to Peralta, and faculty members are the reason that students stay. Keeping high-quality faculty in the District is central to our goal of recruiting and retaining students and building our communities.
A contract that guarantees three years of COLA and part-time parity will show faculty that Peralta cares about instruction and about retaining high-quality, dedicated teachers. It will give teachers a sense of security and renewed confidence in the District in the years ahead. And it will allow faculty, staff, and administration to focus on collectively solving the many issues that we face together.
Before your tenure as Acting Chancellor ends, we ask you to do the right thing and direct your negotiating team to sit down at its Sep. 23 negotiations meeting with PFT and settle a contract that includes part-time parity and COLAs for the 2019-20, 2020-21, and 2021-22 academic years.
Thank you for your attention, and thank you for your care for the faculty that work so hard to serve our students. Sincerely,
|An analysis of the FCMAT findings:|
There’s a lot of talk on campus this fall about Peralta’s financial situation.The crisis, as it’s been described in the press and at the district office, has been apparent to some of us for quite some time; now there are official reports that support the notion that PCCD has been mismanaged.
As we start teaching classes and jump back into our governance work, it’s important to look closely at these reports and draw conclusions based on the data they include; it’s also important that we not rely exclusively on the administration’s narrative about what’s wrong at Peralta.
Let’s start with the report by the Financial Crisis & Management Assistance Team (FCMAT). It’s a long document, over a hundred pages, that analyzes the district’s fiscal health. The executive summary (7) is a useful place to start. Highlights include:
A high fiscal health risk scoreDecreased enrollment paired with increased faculty over the last five yearsPoor communication and operational practicesManagement’s ignorance of policies and proceduresA lack of trust in administrationA surplus of district administratorsAn anemic finance departmentAn incomplete implementation of PeopleSoft softwarePoor internal controls: high fraud potential & unauthorized purchases
While students are often invoked at public meetings, FCMAT noted that in interviews with district personnel “students were rarely mentioned as the purpose for the district’s existence, and no one expressed that the district office exists to provide support and oversight to the colleges.”
Much has been made about the risk of insolvency that the FCMAT report describes. The fiscal health risk score, 69.9% in PCCD’s case, is determined using the Fiscal Health Risk Analysis Questionnaire (9). Looking through these questions offers support for what PFT has been pointing out for years: a lack of actuals in budgeting, inadequate oversight committees, insufficient IT and data management systems, messy internal controls, leadership instability, etc. And, notably, the FCMAT analysis indicates that PCCD has money. We have a positive cash balance, we have a plan to address cash-flow needs, we have sufficient resources to support our obligations, we have money for our facilities, we have adequate reserves, our funding is stable, and the percentage of our unrestricted budget is at or below the statewide average for the last three years. The risk of insolvency, such as it is, isn’t because we’re broke; it’s because we’re poorly managed.
The FCMAT issue that will affect faculty most directly is the assertion that Peralta has too many faculty members relative to the number of students we serve. We’re told there are too many low-enrolled sections and that we aren’t hitting our productivity targets. The district’s attempt to “fix” this alleged discrepancy by cutting 12.5% of our Full-time Equivalent Faculty (FTEF) could well put us afoul of the 50% law. The state mandates that the district spend at least 50% of its unrestricted funds on instruction. Right now, PCCD is at 50.07%. Where will the cutting come from? The parcel tax funds that were the subject of so much criticism over the past several years?
PFT will continue to fight to make sure that classroom dollars are spent in the classroom. Please join us in ensuring that the information used is accurate, complete, and aimed at supporting the work that we are all here to do!
Click the link to read an analysis from PFT on the FCMAT report.